Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Rebecca's avatar

“Money laundering” has existed as long as trade, banking and ruler confiscation schemes have existed (thousands of years). Is laundering through crypto any harder to track than earlier methods? Might it even be easier because of the immutability of blockchains?

Bruce's avatar

Regarding the difference in legitimacy between fiat and crypto currencies, my understanding is as follows. Fiat currency, despite being created out of nothing nevertheless has value because the issuing government requires tax to be paid in that currency. Failure to pay tax eventually can result in a visit from men with guns and time in jail. That's ultimately what makes it undeniably real.

Crypto on the other hand does not have armed police enforcing the acceptance of its value. Its only clear use case is hiding criminally related transactions and as a vehicle for speculation. As such it seems like crypto is vulnerable to government regulation cracking down on its role in money laundering which could easily result in the speculative bubble bursting since there is nothing forcing its claim to possess value. All the gobbledygook about the wonders of blockchain is essentially irrelevant bullshit.

Have I missed anything important?

10 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?