Andrew Neil is a Scottish journalist and broadcaster. He edited The Sunday Times from 1983 to 1994, overseeing the Wapping dispute, then became a media executive and chairman of The Spectator. Known for his forensic interviews, he presented Sunday Politics, This Week and Daily Politics on the BBC. He briefly chaired GB News in 2021 before leaving, later focusing on writing and commentary.
Tomorrow, he is joining Francis and Konstantin in London to discuss the Labour Party conference, Andy Burnham, British politics and his predictions for the next UK election.
Leave your questions for Andrew in the comments.
Have you ever thought about getting a second passport or a backup residency somewhere else? Expat Money helps you build exactly that kind of Plan-B.
Mikkel Thorup has lived as an expat for over 25 years, visited more than 110 countries, and calls nine of them home. He built Expat Money to help others do the same. Every recommendation he makes comes from something he’s already done himself.
Expat Money works with people who want to reduce their exposure to any one government or system: second residencies, second citizenships, offshore banking, international real estate, legal structures that spread your life across borders.
His free report, Plan-B Residencies and Instant Citizenships, covers:
Five routes to a second passport, including one almost nobody discusses
How a foreign residency works as genuine political insurance
Which countries actually make sense for what you’re trying to protect
What it realistically costs
If you’ve ever thought about a Plan-B, this is where you start.
Download the free report at expatmoney.com/trigger. No charge, no catch.
Which has been the worst government you've had the pleasure of holding to account and where does the current one rank?
One hallmark of your interviewing style is the use of statistics and hard facts to ask very precise questions. How do you prepare: do you start with the politician’s argument and look for the numbers that test it, or start with the data and see where the argument breaks down? Or something completely different?