Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Holly MathNerd's avatar

I agree with your argument that increased female influence has, among other consequences, made culture more attuned to and focused on emotion. What I’m trying to understand is why, at the same time, we often fail to name the emotional forces driving much of male behavior — loneliness, humiliation, status anxiety, anger, rage. These shape politics and public life dramatically, yet we rarely describe them as “emotional.” If the culture really is more emotional now, why do we still treat male emotion as something else — as politics, ideology, or crisis — rather than acknowledging it as emotion too?

Expand full comment
Nathan Woodard's avatar

In your view, which countries have most successfully advanced women’s progress and protected their interests while avoiding the pitfalls you’ve so brilliantly articulated? And here in America, was there a time when the pace and culture of change was about right......where, if we’d just stayed that course, we might have gotten it right in the end?

Expand full comment
34 more comments...

No posts