Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Holly MathNerd's avatar

I agree with your argument that increased female influence has, among other consequences, made culture more attuned to and focused on emotion. What I’m trying to understand is why, at the same time, we often fail to name the emotional forces driving much of male behavior — loneliness, humiliation, status anxiety, anger, rage. These shape politics and public life dramatically, yet we rarely describe them as “emotional.” If the culture really is more emotional now, why do we still treat male emotion as something else — as politics, ideology, or crisis — rather than acknowledging it as emotion too?

Expand full comment
Sal Yousaf's avatar

What happens when a feminised society comes into conflict with a masculinised one?

Expand full comment
12 more comments...

No posts