Suella Braverman is the Reform UK MP for Fareham and Waterlooville, first elected in 2015. She’s held senior roles including Parliamentary Under-Secretary at DExEU, Attorney General, and Home Secretary, focusing on Brexit, immigration, and security. Locally, she champions free speech, secure borders, and community issues like infrastructure, healthcare, and education. Married with two children, she lives in Hampshire and remains committed to constituents.
Tomorrow, she is returning to the show to discuss her political career, thoughts on British politics, Reform and the future of the country.
Comment your questions for Suella.
Have you ever thought about getting a second passport or a backup residency somewhere else? Expat Money helps you build exactly that kind of Plan-B.
Mikkel Thorup has lived as an expat for over 25 years, visited more than 110 countries, and calls nine of them home. He built Expat Money to help others do the same. Every recommendation he makes comes from something he’s already done himself.
Expat Money works with people who want to reduce their exposure to any one government or system: second residencies, second citizenships, offshore banking, international real estate, legal structures that spread your life across borders.
His free report, Plan-B Residencies and Instant Citizenships, covers:
Five routes to a second passport, including one almost nobody discusses
How a foreign residency works as genuine political insurance
Which countries actually make sense for what you’re trying to protect
What it realistically costs
If you’ve ever thought about a Plan-B, this is where you start.
Download the free report at expatmoney.com/trigger. No charge, no catch.




Given the understandable frustration Suella had with the system of Westminster and the civil service and how maddening it sounded to actually get anything done. What difference will moving from one party to another make if Reform were to form a government to when Suella was secretary of state before?
If Reform wins Parliament how will they not be prevented from implementing their reforms by an entrenched bureaucracy deeply opposed to the Reform policy? If a Reform government is unable to implement their policies would that mean that democracy actually doesn’t exist in the UK, but that bureaucracy is the ruling regime instead as a kind of new aristocracy?