Does the fact that the chair of the BBC is an Indian-heritaged Muslim affect the BBC’s failure to properly report on the Pakistani grooming gangs and its virulent anti-Israel narrative?
Do you have any anecdotal accounts of out-of-work social mixing with BBC colleagues, drinks, dinners etc, how did they feel and how did you navigate them, and were you alone?
As a former BBC employee myself until about 4 years ago I became increasingly disillusioned with the corporation's path, particularly regarding journalistic integrity.
Newsnigjt itself had become a major problem, it survived the Saville scandal after pulling an article about his antics before they became common knowledge. So they didn't learn from their mistakes.
Emily Maitlis often behave her personal editorial stance, such as Dominic Cummings going to his in laws home during lockdown.
Do you think Emily Maitlis and her colleagues deliberately made this editorial decision and do they even care about the BBC Charter and due impartiality requirements?
Do you think the BBC should continue as a publicly funded entity. If so how do we guarantee impartiality and balanced reporting of news and events. Or should they become self supporting similar to other channels?
Does the BBC intentionally publish false or unverified information regarding Israel? If so, why?
Does the fact that the chair of the BBC is an Indian-heritaged Muslim affect the BBC’s failure to properly report on the Pakistani grooming gangs and its virulent anti-Israel narrative?
Will the person or persons who actually did the trump edits ever be sacked/identified?
What percentage of the employees do you think agree with the edits
Will the BBC ever learn or just issue a few platitudes and carry on exactly the same?
Who decides which side the BBC portrays in a better or worse light?
Is there a clear political motivation behind the narrative?
Was there anyone at the BBC you contemplated telling or is the entire institution corrupt and a malignant cancer incapable of healing itself?
Do you have any anecdotal accounts of out-of-work social mixing with BBC colleagues, drinks, dinners etc, how did they feel and how did you navigate them, and were you alone?
As a former BBC employee myself until about 4 years ago I became increasingly disillusioned with the corporation's path, particularly regarding journalistic integrity.
Newsnigjt itself had become a major problem, it survived the Saville scandal after pulling an article about his antics before they became common knowledge. So they didn't learn from their mistakes.
Emily Maitlis often behave her personal editorial stance, such as Dominic Cummings going to his in laws home during lockdown.
Do you think Emily Maitlis and her colleagues deliberately made this editorial decision and do they even care about the BBC Charter and due impartiality requirements?
is the BBC institutionally "woke" / far left and what else have they manipulated to fit that agenda?
What is one immediate, one medium and one long teem change you think is needed at the BBC to turn it around?
Do you think the BBC should continue as a publicly funded entity. If so how do we guarantee impartiality and balanced reporting of news and events. Or should they become self supporting similar to other channels?
How does the BBC think they benefit by taking sides in US politics? Is the goal to try and shape American audiences?
No comment other than to say kudos to Trig for getting this whistleblower to appear on the show.
Is the rot from the bottom up or top down, or both.
If not the BBC, then where should we be going for news, if anywhere?
Were there any other cuts of the speech and if so why was this one chosen?
Have you hired security?