Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Jamie Miller's avatar

Guilt must rest on evidence, not reputation. Justice judges the act, not the actor.

But once guilt is proved, past convictions matter. A first offence may merit leniency. A hundred do not. Habitual criminals warrant habitual consequences.

Escalating sentences for repeat offenders is not vengeance. It is prudence. Deterrence may be imperfect, but amnesia is worse.

Should repeat offenders receive escalating sentences?

Expand full comment
curious2plus2's avatar

How do we incentivize the policing of genuine crime rather than low hanging fruit (i.e mean/distasteful tweets) in a climate where the police have been going through a softer rebranding and the college of policing appears to still be steering in this direction?

Expand full comment
7 more comments...

No posts