If basically every police officer has the same opinions about DEI, uni degrees, and actually solving crime, why is it so hard to just DOGE the met and similar organisations, get new leadership, and do the things that everyone is telling the police department to do?
Is the requirement for officers to get university degrees just a way of ensuring ideological conformity, outsourcing the culture formation of police to civilian universities ill-suited to inculcating the necessary values of blind justice and community service?
Where does two tier policing originate and will it ever go back? ie different responses to "civil unrest" according to race - EG notting hill pocket violence seemingly gets a pass while "angry bin throwing" at henry novak gets full treatment, "take your weapons to the mosque" vs white football fans? It seems to many anomolies to not be deliberate, we have all heard of more.
How should police deal with morally questionable directives? I really struggle to trust police on any matter after witnessing the way they behaved during the pandemic.
Simple one, how do we practically dismantle the college of policing and get back to a focus on crime that has a genuine impact on societal/cultural cohesion?
How much of the current problems in policing can be traced to senior officers, and how much has the destructive reality-denying ideology penetrated into the rank and file? After a few years, do recruits still believe the myths, or do they simply toe the line, because they know that not to do so would be bad for their careers?
My impression of the Police as a teenager in the 1970s in New Zealand was they were big blokes over 6 feet tall, very socially conservative and what they typically lacked in intellectual sophistication was compensated by a palpable aurora of don't fuck with me I'm in charge here alpha male.
So I was a bit surprised to see a female head of Victoria (Australia) police joining the gay pride march in umiform some time in the early 2000s. Surprised because it seemed to represent a massive cultural shift. I also thought police should be keeping the peace during political demonstrations not joining them in uniform.
Even more surprising and horrifying was stabbing victim Henry Nowak apparently arrested and handcuffed for being fatally stabbed while white.
The cultural change form the 1970s to current two tier policing seems to have been fairly rapid. What is the quickest and most effective way to to fix it? And what are going to be the most difficult hurdles?
Why is there two tier policing? Why do the police hate the English population so much? Why aren't their safety nets in place for concerns around EDI to be raised and reported internally and who is really responsible for pushing it?
Well, an obvious one, I don't know if you guys know, is that the Police stopped doing the beep test Even worse, when that moment comes, it'll be predominantly male police officers doing that stuff, putting them at an increased chance of retribution and claims of this and that. You couldn't make it up, but that's not even my real point, no wonder th
In the last few years, there has been an exodus of armed police and SAS operatives. From operational duty, many have retired. This has been the direct consequence of the unparalleled use by the human rights lawyers' establishment in using these individuals as a vehicle to generate huge fees and funds. There have been some very big inquiries. There was one in Afghanistan. Something like that £80 million has been hovered up by human rights lawyers, with, guess what, zero convictions.
Even worse, three guys called Starmer, ex-prime minister with Harmer , Current Attorney General worked with a guy called Phil Shinner, he was subsequently found guilty of fraud by a network of false claims. He was struck off.
The current setup, which is unique to the UK, means that any officer or military can be persecuted for Human Rights after the events under the same rules as would affect a citizen. In perpetuity, basically, they're just there to be used as a vehicle for anyone who wants to take a pop. There is a new, round of legislation coming out of Northern Ireland to go to the well and do exactly that.
But here's the but. I did some analysis to see what our European neighbors did about this. We are always told that the ECHR is absolute, and we are absolute victims of it. We can't do anything about it. We have to go with what they say. That's a lie.
Because the French, the Germans, and many other European nations have negotiated a carveout to cover just this. In other words, the French are looking after our soldiers and our police better than we are. The French.
Plus they all know and are not telling us, so the EU is deploying an agenda big time, I voted remain, but after all this, forget it, they want us weakened and back on their terms.
I've got some initial draftings what would the exact legislation need to look like. As soon as I can, I'm going to take this to some of the veterans' communities to help fix this, but it wouldn't take much time at all. So we could have fixed this at any time in the last 20 years by putting in an amendment to the ECHR giving us the same rights as the other nations, and none of this would have happened. Cost est £500,000. I'll leave you to deduce the reasons why it hasn't happened. It's not difficult.
Can you ask the ex-police officer to confirm what do the police on the ground think about this, as I understand it, the results in terms of our ability to fight. It's 400 armed police who have resigned over this. And who can blame them? And the state just leaves them to be used for the rest of their lives.
The ultimate outcome of the McPherson report, was the establishment of a national framework of recording the race and backgrounds of those charged with crimes. Six characteristics were decided to be measured. Sounds okay, doesn't it?
But it's a very big but, most of the police forces were already collecting 17 different types of characteristics on those charged with crime. And in the merge can you guess which characteristics were merged into one? Ultimate shocking solution of the McPherson report. Was it used to bury Issues of the past, which then went on unabated and that we're well aware of now, related to grooming gangs. As the actions of a very specific group of Pakistani men from a very specific part of Pakistan, can at best be described as clannish are blended with the generally very law-abiding Asian community.
There is something very bad going on right now with the BBC DCMS green paper. We have until the 31st to log evidence. I run a native AI startup called Trinity Helix. I used our technology to completely analyse the entire dataset of the GO Science false and misleading information reports. It was massively incomplete. So massively incomplete. When I applied the government's rules in all different areas, it scored 15 out of 100. It's published on something called the OSF, which gives it the veneer of being cited. In other words, it's being subject to other people checking the data. But get this: anyone can publish there. So guess what I did. Published the correct, fully reinstated full dataset that they didn't.
The amount of stuff that comes out of it is unbelievable. Let me give you a useful nugget. When the BBC committed £243 million that it didn't have it's supercharged DEI initiative under the CDN Diamond Report process in 2020. That time, it was fully compliant with the 2010 Equality Act. To pay for it, amongst the cuts it made, it defunded and completely restructured BBC News. The BBC has tried its hardest to change the goalpost so you can't tell the data, but the need is to say: since that moment alone, it's lost another 30% of its readers. At any moment, the only people watching BBC News are about 70,000 people.
I grew up in the '90s, when house music was a craze. We danced with everybody. We thought we were changing the world. You know, that is gay culture, and it's kind of ultimate, I suppose you'd say. Even I struggle to find an argument as to why there's now a 500% overrepresentation. LGBTQ in the BBC under 250% overrepresentation of BAME
Its zero-sum model, meaning those gains had to come at the expense of other people, and of course they have done. It means if you look at the population, the BBC is actively not making content for about 30% of it.
Their solution to this is to carry on. To then force their content, and the way the rule is read, it could be anyone's content that the government demands, so expect programming from the Home Office soon. And that will take priority in the creators' feeds, such as trigonometry. And what will that do? Well, then what that will do is it will poison the well, and they know this. And Alphabet knows this too, hence it's "keep you choose your campaign."
Putting together a bunch of videos. The time is running out. This was announced the day after Keir Starmer resigned as prime minister. So, funnily enough, it didn't get much media.
Next month, I'm taking entrance exams to be accepted as a recruit to my local harbor police. I live in a major city in Southern California. What's the best piece of advice for a brand new, rookie police officer? Cheers
A taboo question: How useful/practical are female officers in dealing with noncompliant male foreign nationals from highly patriarchal nations?
If basically every police officer has the same opinions about DEI, uni degrees, and actually solving crime, why is it so hard to just DOGE the met and similar organisations, get new leadership, and do the things that everyone is telling the police department to do?
Is the requirement for officers to get university degrees just a way of ensuring ideological conformity, outsourcing the culture formation of police to civilian universities ill-suited to inculcating the necessary values of blind justice and community service?
Where does two tier policing originate and will it ever go back? ie different responses to "civil unrest" according to race - EG notting hill pocket violence seemingly gets a pass while "angry bin throwing" at henry novak gets full treatment, "take your weapons to the mosque" vs white football fans? It seems to many anomolies to not be deliberate, we have all heard of more.
How should police deal with morally questionable directives? I really struggle to trust police on any matter after witnessing the way they behaved during the pandemic.
I've read/heard that an old policy of recruitment from discharged Armed Forces personnel should be revived. How practical is that today?
Simple one, how do we practically dismantle the college of policing and get back to a focus on crime that has a genuine impact on societal/cultural cohesion?
How much of the current problems in policing can be traced to senior officers, and how much has the destructive reality-denying ideology penetrated into the rank and file? After a few years, do recruits still believe the myths, or do they simply toe the line, because they know that not to do so would be bad for their careers?
With the buzz of civil war on everybody's tongue, where do you think the police would stand¿ And what use would they be?
My impression of the Police as a teenager in the 1970s in New Zealand was they were big blokes over 6 feet tall, very socially conservative and what they typically lacked in intellectual sophistication was compensated by a palpable aurora of don't fuck with me I'm in charge here alpha male.
So I was a bit surprised to see a female head of Victoria (Australia) police joining the gay pride march in umiform some time in the early 2000s. Surprised because it seemed to represent a massive cultural shift. I also thought police should be keeping the peace during political demonstrations not joining them in uniform.
Even more surprising and horrifying was stabbing victim Henry Nowak apparently arrested and handcuffed for being fatally stabbed while white.
The cultural change form the 1970s to current two tier policing seems to have been fairly rapid. What is the quickest and most effective way to to fix it? And what are going to be the most difficult hurdles?
I believe the Broken Windows Theory is one of the best forms of crime prevention in a community. Why don't more police agencies practice it?
Why is there two tier policing? Why do the police hate the English population so much? Why aren't their safety nets in place for concerns around EDI to be raised and reported internally and who is really responsible for pushing it?
Another one for your ex-met police officer
Well, an obvious one, I don't know if you guys know, is that the Police stopped doing the beep test Even worse, when that moment comes, it'll be predominantly male police officers doing that stuff, putting them at an increased chance of retribution and claims of this and that. You couldn't make it up, but that's not even my real point, no wonder th
In the last few years, there has been an exodus of armed police and SAS operatives. From operational duty, many have retired. This has been the direct consequence of the unparalleled use by the human rights lawyers' establishment in using these individuals as a vehicle to generate huge fees and funds. There have been some very big inquiries. There was one in Afghanistan. Something like that £80 million has been hovered up by human rights lawyers, with, guess what, zero convictions.
Even worse, three guys called Starmer, ex-prime minister with Harmer , Current Attorney General worked with a guy called Phil Shinner, he was subsequently found guilty of fraud by a network of false claims. He was struck off.
The current setup, which is unique to the UK, means that any officer or military can be persecuted for Human Rights after the events under the same rules as would affect a citizen. In perpetuity, basically, they're just there to be used as a vehicle for anyone who wants to take a pop. There is a new, round of legislation coming out of Northern Ireland to go to the well and do exactly that.
But here's the but. I did some analysis to see what our European neighbors did about this. We are always told that the ECHR is absolute, and we are absolute victims of it. We can't do anything about it. We have to go with what they say. That's a lie.
Because the French, the Germans, and many other European nations have negotiated a carveout to cover just this. In other words, the French are looking after our soldiers and our police better than we are. The French.
Plus they all know and are not telling us, so the EU is deploying an agenda big time, I voted remain, but after all this, forget it, they want us weakened and back on their terms.
I've got some initial draftings what would the exact legislation need to look like. As soon as I can, I'm going to take this to some of the veterans' communities to help fix this, but it wouldn't take much time at all. So we could have fixed this at any time in the last 20 years by putting in an amendment to the ECHR giving us the same rights as the other nations, and none of this would have happened. Cost est £500,000. I'll leave you to deduce the reasons why it hasn't happened. It's not difficult.
Can you ask the ex-police officer to confirm what do the police on the ground think about this, as I understand it, the results in terms of our ability to fight. It's 400 armed police who have resigned over this. And who can blame them? And the state just leaves them to be used for the rest of their lives.
The ultimate outcome of the McPherson report, was the establishment of a national framework of recording the race and backgrounds of those charged with crimes. Six characteristics were decided to be measured. Sounds okay, doesn't it?
But it's a very big but, most of the police forces were already collecting 17 different types of characteristics on those charged with crime. And in the merge can you guess which characteristics were merged into one? Ultimate shocking solution of the McPherson report. Was it used to bury Issues of the past, which then went on unabated and that we're well aware of now, related to grooming gangs. As the actions of a very specific group of Pakistani men from a very specific part of Pakistan, can at best be described as clannish are blended with the generally very law-abiding Asian community.
There is something very bad going on right now with the BBC DCMS green paper. We have until the 31st to log evidence. I run a native AI startup called Trinity Helix. I used our technology to completely analyse the entire dataset of the GO Science false and misleading information reports. It was massively incomplete. So massively incomplete. When I applied the government's rules in all different areas, it scored 15 out of 100. It's published on something called the OSF, which gives it the veneer of being cited. In other words, it's being subject to other people checking the data. But get this: anyone can publish there. So guess what I did. Published the correct, fully reinstated full dataset that they didn't.
The amount of stuff that comes out of it is unbelievable. Let me give you a useful nugget. When the BBC committed £243 million that it didn't have it's supercharged DEI initiative under the CDN Diamond Report process in 2020. That time, it was fully compliant with the 2010 Equality Act. To pay for it, amongst the cuts it made, it defunded and completely restructured BBC News. The BBC has tried its hardest to change the goalpost so you can't tell the data, but the need is to say: since that moment alone, it's lost another 30% of its readers. At any moment, the only people watching BBC News are about 70,000 people.
I grew up in the '90s, when house music was a craze. We danced with everybody. We thought we were changing the world. You know, that is gay culture, and it's kind of ultimate, I suppose you'd say. Even I struggle to find an argument as to why there's now a 500% overrepresentation. LGBTQ in the BBC under 250% overrepresentation of BAME
Its zero-sum model, meaning those gains had to come at the expense of other people, and of course they have done. It means if you look at the population, the BBC is actively not making content for about 30% of it.
Their solution to this is to carry on. To then force their content, and the way the rule is read, it could be anyone's content that the government demands, so expect programming from the Home Office soon. And that will take priority in the creators' feeds, such as trigonometry. And what will that do? Well, then what that will do is it will poison the well, and they know this. And Alphabet knows this too, hence it's "keep you choose your campaign."
Putting together a bunch of videos. The time is running out. This was announced the day after Keir Starmer resigned as prime minister. So, funnily enough, it didn't get much media.
Next month, I'm taking entrance exams to be accepted as a recruit to my local harbor police. I live in a major city in Southern California. What's the best piece of advice for a brand new, rookie police officer? Cheers
How quickly can the police turn around the increasing crime statistics? Is it even possible in the current political climate?